When it comes to BREXIT you can see why this happens and it isn't because of racism or this or that other social imperfection, it is simply that rapid development and rapid social improvements have happened a lot more in London than in England, per se. Thus the needs of London are quite respected and demanded whereas the needs of the rest of the Country are put to the side. It is the same with the revolutionary rise of Trump...The needs of people, straight, gay, transgender, day care, etc etc in the large cities are seen as very socially important and progressive by the denizens, whereas in rural/provincial areas the need is simply to have some job. If rapid social development and education had occurred evenly throughout each country, as is the responsibility of Governance, rather just in City Pockets, then needs would equivocate and a 'rising tide would lift all boats'. So to seek to find a place in England or the USA outside the density of a particular city, or a few, means that people do need to bring about significant change in the way their governments deliver services and, indeed, focus on 'the people' per se, rather than what could be seen as an elite in the cities draining the wealth from the country and a lot of it then going away overseas. Thailand is a perfect example of this in extreme. There really is only one City in Thailand, Bangkok, and Bangkokians do very well indeed, while the country itself goes up shit creek in a barbed wire canoe, with, eventually, devastating consequences for all...as we will see in Thailand within the next year and for the coming decade...the destabilisation of all of South East Asia based upon a simple pro-city pro-elite economy and a form of structured severe very greedy corrupt elite superiority.

When it comes to BREXIT you can see why this happens and it isn't because of racism or this or that other social imperfection, it is simply that rapid development and rapid social improvements have happened a lot more in London than in England, per se. Thus the needs of London are quite respected and demanded whereas the needs of the rest of the Country are put to the side.

It is the same with the revolutionary rise of Trump...The needs of people, straight, gay, transgender, day care, etc etc in the large cities are seen as very socially important and progressive by the denizens, whereas in rural/provincial areas the need is simply to have some job. If rapid social development and education had occurred evenly throughout each country, as is the responsibility of Governance, rather just in City Pockets, then needs would equivocate and a 'rising tide would lift all boats'.

So to seek to find a place in England or the USA outside the density of a particular city, or a few, means that people do need to bring about significant change in the way their governments deliver services and, indeed, focus on 'the people' per se, rather than what could be seen as an elite in the cities draining the wealth from the country and a lot of it then going away overseas.

Thailand is a perfect example of this in extreme. There really is only one City in Thailand, Bangkok, and Bangkokians do very well indeed, while the country itself goes up shit creek in a barbed wire canoe without a paddle, with, eventually, devastating consequences for all...as we will see in Thailand within the next year and for the coming decade...the destabilisation of all of South East Asia based upon a simple pro-city pro-elite economy and a form of structured, severe, very greedy, corrupt elite superiority.