Thursday, 29 September 2016

This is a lovely book...Thousand Cranes by Yasunari Kawabata...you pick it up and think 'gosh this small book is hardly anything...so few pages...why should I pay $9 for this?' and you read it, and it stays in your thinking for at least 50 years. This is literature, and this is what literature does.


I see the US is threatening to disengage from the war in Syria...well, that'd be good, if you could trust them, but you can't. You know they won't stop.


I still wonder why international news agencies don't see a link between the downing of the Malaysian passenger plane, M370, and the direct personal gift soon after of $800 million from the Saudi Royal family to the Prime Minister of Malaysia who orchestrated the investigation.

That area of the South China Sea where the plane actually went off the radar and out of the sky is an area with massive US Navy forces testing and perfecting all kinds of advanced technology to knock out and ping China's sea coast defence systems...and amazingly, they didn't see or hear a thing...nope, not one thing...
Soon after Obama arrived in Malaysia to work out a new military aid plan for Malaysia and the Saudi Royal family gave the Prime Minister of Malaysia a personal gift of $800 MILLION US Dollars.
I doubt the US Military MEANT to knock the plane down, but I think they did do it. Then everyone looked everywhere else instead.
As we know, these kind of military errors happen all the time in that kind of dangerous probing provocative theatre.

On Syria, the USA & Russia. The US + UK, +some European Nations, Middle East Nations, and Australia have 3 options in regard to the war in Syria: 1: Stop supporting the rebel forces fighting the Assad Syrian sovereign Government, and go home. Peace and stability would return in time. 2: Continue drip-feeding the rebels with weapons and white phosphorous airstrikes, and prolong the war...endlessly. 3: Declare War on the Syrian Government and its military allies Russia and Iran. There are only these 3 options.The best option is Option 1.


I note the Philippine Government is, from October, having no more military 'games' or 'drills' with the USA in the South China Sea so as not to provoke their neighbour China. They wish to have bi-lateral negotiations with China rather than cause damage to their long relationship with China. The Americans are very unhappy about this...as the whole point of forcing the Phillipines to take the case of the islands to the international sea court was to provoke China...even though it was a court that neither the USA or China recognise as having any right to make judgements about anything. Well done Philippines Government!


Trump, Clinton, CNN, FOX, ABC Australia & SBS, BBC, AL JAZEERA, RT RUSSIA TV, NHK JAPAN & CCTV CHINA

The recent News Fiesta of the American Presidential Race and Debates (Number One) was fascinating in showing just how much News Channels, world wide, private and public, express the need to provide a particular narrative to suit or perhaps sometimes sway their audiences. I think, over all, they just want to provide News that their audiences prefer, rather than seek to sway folk as only the American stations can have a real role in sway-bias.
By saying 'narrative' I do mean 'bias'. Having access to a number of National and International News Services it was interesting to note the narratives and how they played to various biases within communities.
In Australia, the Australian Broadcasting Commission ABC and The Special Broadcasting Service, SBS; both Public News Networks, played the narrative as very Pro-Clinton without being abashed about this at all, as did most of the Australian Commercial Channels, either Free to Air or cable.
CNN USA provided very pro-Clinton views as did the BBC, and as did Al Jazeera from Doha. CNN was particularly anti-Trump.
Fox pushed a very hard Pro-Trump line, as did RT Russian Television.
Both Fox and CNN are important in that the Bulk of Americans, the "Basket of Deplorable & The Bunch of Babies" have direct capacities to influence voters and use this power without any notion regarding to balance or general fairness.
As noted some time back, and reinforced by the Debate smorgasbord, the two international channels NHK Japan and CCTV China did provide very good objective analyses of the event and the general Presidential race. NHK Japan often does provide very good, if simple, analysis of world events (except anything to do with islands under discussion in the South China Sea, and even when discussing these problematic areas, NHK does approach the subject with some sense of decorum. China's CCTV over all provides the best objective news, with a complexity of depth and analysis that is years ahead in terms of accuracy and objectivity than any other channel, world wide.

Wednesday, 28 September 2016

Trump and Clinton and DPRK

‘China should go into North Korea’ – Donald Trump
‘China should go into North Korea’ – Donald Trump
Clinton responds by reassuring long-term allies on the U.S.' mutual defense treaties
September 27th, 2016
The U.S. Republican Presidential hopeful Donald J. Trump on Monday said “China should go into North Korea” to stop Pyongyang’s nuclear development, during the first Presidential Debate with Hilary Clinton held at Hofstra University.
Trump doubled down on previous statements that Beijing should solve the current diplomatic deadlock on the Korean Peninsula, while also reiterating previous claims about potentially altering the U.S.’ mutual defense treaties in the region.
“You look at North Korea; we are doing nothing there. China should solve that problem for us. China should go into North Korea. China is totally powerful as it relates to North Korea,” Trump said.
The Republican candidate’s proposed policy on North Korea has not been welcomed with open arms, and is often viewed as overly simplistic.
“Has the Bush administration not tried to use Chinese leverage to control Pyongyang? Has not the Obama administration?,” Eom Sang-yoon, a research fellow at the Sejong Institute told NK News.
“What is Trump saying is very basic, so far he has not provided any details on how his policy will be different from that of Obama.”
The presidential nominee followed up the remarks by saying he would have used the U.S. – Iran deal to further pressure the DPRK into giving up its nuclear weapons.
“Iran is one of their biggest trading partners, Iran has power over North Korea, and when they (current U.S. government) made that horrible deal with Iran, they should’ve included the fact that they do something with respect to North Korea.”
While Tehran and Pyongyang almost certainly have some trade interactions, their exact scope is unknown, as neither country publishes bilateral trade figures.
“Neither Iran or North Korea are overly interested in publishing their trade data, and according to the ITC trade database, there hasn’t been any trade between the two countries since 2005,” Leo Byrne, the Data and Analytic Director at NK News said.
DEFENSE TREATIES
During the debate, Trump once again took aim at how U.S. allies, including Japan, and South Korea’s are “free-riding” on U.S. defense budgets. Democratic hopeful Clinton took the opposite tack, saying the U.S. would “honor mutual defense treaties.”
“We defend Japan, we defend Germany, we defend South Korea, we defend Saudi Arabia, we defend countries,” Trump continued. “They do not pay us, but they should be paying us because we are providing tremendous service and losing a fortune.”
Trump insisted the U.S. footing other countries’ defense bills was the reason why “we lose on everything,” while adding that it’s possible the U.S. “can’t defend Japan, a behemoth selling us cars by the millions” unless it pays the fair share.
“They may have to defend themselves, or they have to help us out, we are a country that owes $20 trillion. They have to help us out.”
In response, Hillary Clinton used the debate platform ease potential concerns among long-term allies about U.S. commitment to its defense agreements.
“I want to reassure our allies in Japan and South Korea and elsewhere that we have mutual defense treaties, and we will honor them.”
Trump’s first raised the issue of defense costs in Asia back in March, when he claimed that if elected President he might withdraw U.S. forces from Seoul if it does contribute more to its defense costs.
The remarks ruffled feathers in the South, where both progressives and conservatives expressed concern and criticized Trump’s plans. But the plans won the Republican hopeful a ringing endorsement from North Korea linked outlet DPRK Today
“The president that U.S. citizens must vote for is not that dull Hillary but Trump, who spoke of holding a direct conversation with North Korea,” the article, published in May reads.
Featured Image: The Presidential Debate – LIVE Monday, September 26, 2016, 9 PM EST