Wednesday, 28 September 2016

Trump and Clinton and DPRK

‘China should go into North Korea’ – Donald Trump
‘China should go into North Korea’ – Donald Trump
Clinton responds by reassuring long-term allies on the U.S.' mutual defense treaties
September 27th, 2016
The U.S. Republican Presidential hopeful Donald J. Trump on Monday said “China should go into North Korea” to stop Pyongyang’s nuclear development, during the first Presidential Debate with Hilary Clinton held at Hofstra University.
Trump doubled down on previous statements that Beijing should solve the current diplomatic deadlock on the Korean Peninsula, while also reiterating previous claims about potentially altering the U.S.’ mutual defense treaties in the region.
“You look at North Korea; we are doing nothing there. China should solve that problem for us. China should go into North Korea. China is totally powerful as it relates to North Korea,” Trump said.
The Republican candidate’s proposed policy on North Korea has not been welcomed with open arms, and is often viewed as overly simplistic.
“Has the Bush administration not tried to use Chinese leverage to control Pyongyang? Has not the Obama administration?,” Eom Sang-yoon, a research fellow at the Sejong Institute told NK News.
“What is Trump saying is very basic, so far he has not provided any details on how his policy will be different from that of Obama.”
The presidential nominee followed up the remarks by saying he would have used the U.S. – Iran deal to further pressure the DPRK into giving up its nuclear weapons.
“Iran is one of their biggest trading partners, Iran has power over North Korea, and when they (current U.S. government) made that horrible deal with Iran, they should’ve included the fact that they do something with respect to North Korea.”
While Tehran and Pyongyang almost certainly have some trade interactions, their exact scope is unknown, as neither country publishes bilateral trade figures.
“Neither Iran or North Korea are overly interested in publishing their trade data, and according to the ITC trade database, there hasn’t been any trade between the two countries since 2005,” Leo Byrne, the Data and Analytic Director at NK News said.
DEFENSE TREATIES
During the debate, Trump once again took aim at how U.S. allies, including Japan, and South Korea’s are “free-riding” on U.S. defense budgets. Democratic hopeful Clinton took the opposite tack, saying the U.S. would “honor mutual defense treaties.”
“We defend Japan, we defend Germany, we defend South Korea, we defend Saudi Arabia, we defend countries,” Trump continued. “They do not pay us, but they should be paying us because we are providing tremendous service and losing a fortune.”
Trump insisted the U.S. footing other countries’ defense bills was the reason why “we lose on everything,” while adding that it’s possible the U.S. “can’t defend Japan, a behemoth selling us cars by the millions” unless it pays the fair share.
“They may have to defend themselves, or they have to help us out, we are a country that owes $20 trillion. They have to help us out.”
In response, Hillary Clinton used the debate platform ease potential concerns among long-term allies about U.S. commitment to its defense agreements.
“I want to reassure our allies in Japan and South Korea and elsewhere that we have mutual defense treaties, and we will honor them.”
Trump’s first raised the issue of defense costs in Asia back in March, when he claimed that if elected President he might withdraw U.S. forces from Seoul if it does contribute more to its defense costs.
The remarks ruffled feathers in the South, where both progressives and conservatives expressed concern and criticized Trump’s plans. But the plans won the Republican hopeful a ringing endorsement from North Korea linked outlet DPRK Today
“The president that U.S. citizens must vote for is not that dull Hillary but Trump, who spoke of holding a direct conversation with North Korea,” the article, published in May reads.
Featured Image: The Presidential Debate – LIVE Monday, September 26, 2016, 9 PM EST

Pics DPRK

US Sanctions and North Korea WMD trade

U.S. sanctions, charges Chinese network linked to North Korea WMD trade

U.S. sanctions, charges Chinese network linked to North Korea WMD trade
Sanctions come as embattled conglomerate accused of "serious economic crimes" by PRC authorities
September 26th, 2016

The United States government has issued designations and unsealed charges against a Chinese company and affiliated individuals linked to illicit trade with North Korea, according to official press releases issued on Monday.
The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Dandong HongXiang Industrial Development Co. Ltd. (DHID) and four senior managers under Executive Order (E.O.) 13382, which targets WMD proliferators. 
The Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted the same four individuals for “conspiring to evade U.S. economic sanctions and violating the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations (WMDPSR).”
The individuals were identified as being DHID’s Deputy General Manager Jinhua Hong, General Manager Jianshu Zhou, Financial Manager Chuanxu Luo and the company’s high-profile Director, Xiaohong Ma.
The DOJ alleges that DHID, in their dealings with North Korea, used offshore front companies to conduct U.S. dollar financial transactions through the U.S. banking system. This involved the Korea Kwangson Banking Corporation (KKBC), an entity sanctioned by both the U.S. and the United Nations Security Council.
“These sales transactions were allegedly financed or guaranteed by KKBC.  These front companies facilitated the financial transactions to hide KKBC’s presence from correspondent banks in the United States, according to the allegations in the complaints,” the DOJ press release reads.

The complaint identifies the period of activity to have occurred between August 2009 and September 2015. It is also noted that the complaint is an allegation and that those mentioned are presumed innocent until proven guilty. 
Despite this, the DOJ has issued a civil forfeiture of funds within 25 Chinese bank accounts they believe to belong to DHID and its network of front companies.
“The charges unsealed today reflect our nation’s commitment to using all tools to deter and disrupt weapons of mass destruction proliferators,” Assistant Attorney General Carlin was quoted in the press release as saying.
Adam J. Szubin, acting Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, said the designations also expose a “key illicit network supporting North Korea’s weapons proliferation”.
Authorities in northeast China last week announced that the conglomerate, which is based in Dandong, was under investigation for “serious economic crimes”, but did not say whether the inquiry was related to DHID’s alleged business with North Korea.
DHID was the subject of a recent investigative report published by the ASAN Institute and C4ADS, which shows a detailed network of affiliated companies involved in high levels of trade with North Korea.
The report claimed that the company had assisted in the development of centrifuges for uranium enrichment by supplying Pyongyang with aluminum ingots, ammonium paratungstate, aluminum oxide and tungsten tri­oxide.
Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons
Featured Image: Dandong, Liaoning Province by Prince Roy on 2007-10-20 14:38:21

Tuesday, 27 September 2016

The main readership for the blog is USA and Russia and Europe. It isn't much, but a few hundred hits a day is okay. All I started yacking about, anyway, was the critical tectonic importance of North Asia rather than the importance of the USA, Australia etc. So much is happening in North Asia and so little of anything important is or can happen in the Middle East. No one really likes Israel or Palestine...Iraq or Syria or Libya...and how could anyone like them? They are non-starters in terms of massive human reason and abiding human importance.


Trump's comment re North Asia: Why doesn't China just go in and take North Korea? Because China doesn't invade Sovereign Nations, never has, never will, you dickhead. China respects National Borders. Invasion is not what China does. America does invasion...that's what it does in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria...and why the US is broke and corrupted beyond all belief. China does do peace and non-invasion. China does do good business. China lives well in the good future that they are every day creating for themselves, and secondarily, interconnected, interlinked, inter dependent...for the real world...rather than destroying everything they can wherever they can, as America continues to do as a sick and old and failing people.


I think both Hillary and Donald are very good at obeying the 3 Baby Boomer Laws of Politics: 1: Never Say You Are Sorry. 2: Never Explain. 3: Never Tell the Truth. I think Hillary is ahead in the professionalism regarding the above ethical laws of American Governance.


It must be really annoying for the Millenials that these World War 2 Baby Boomers hang on so tight and madly to fading Power, well beyond their capacity to deliver anything useful to the 21st century.