Saturday, 2 January 2016

How North Korea became Kim Il Sung’s Korea

How North Korea became Kim Il Sung’s Korea
By Fyodor Tertitskiy

On August 8, 1945, when the Soviet Union attacked Imperial Japan, Kim Il Sung was still a nobody. He, a mere captain of the Red Army hardly dreamed about leading a country. But 1945 was a truly momentous year for East Asia, when things changed so rapidly as they never had before. Japan was already crippled by the Americans, and the atomic bombardments, plus the fact that the USSR had joined the war, forced Tokyo to accept the inevitable.

On August 15, Emperor Showa announced the surrender of the Empire, and for two more weeks the Soviet troops were busy accepting surrender of the Japanese military units stationed in the northern part of Korea. However, very soon, in August or September 1945 the USSR decided that a socialist state would be built in North Korea and this state was supposed to be completely controlled by the Soviet Union.

The person who was de facto in charge of North Korea was Colonel General Terentiy Fomich Shtykov. He was a born in Belorussia and, being a protégé of the Politburo member Andrei Zhdanov, rose to become a political officer of the First Far Eastern Front of the Red Army, achieving the rank of colonel general – the highest a political officer could gain. It was Shtykov who was overseeing the creation of the North Korean state.

Kim’s New Year’s address indicates bumpy road for inter-Korean ties

Kim’s New Year’s address indicates bumpy road for inter-Korean ties
Kim’s New Year’s address indicates bumpy road for inter-Korean ties
Leader's latest address displays new-found independence from the legacy of his father, grandfather
January 1st, 2016
Since 2013, for the last three years Kim Jong Un has used his New Year’s address to speak of North Korea’s prospects and its policy conceptions. Obviously, as North Korea’s governmental system is different from other parts of the world, their annual address does not always correspond to what they said in the early days of the year. Often, Kim’s oration ends up as nothing but rhetoric.
But researchers can’t skip analysis of Kim’s words, as the message comes from the one and onlySuryong, the Supreme Leader, giving important clues as to which direction North Korea will head in this year.
‘KIM JONG UN-STYLE RHETORIC’
One thing that is significantly different about Kim Jong Un’s 2016 address is that the nuance of the speech has a subtle distinction compared to that of previous ones.
North Korea’s New Year’s address hasn’t been the same each time, and every year the leader has provided a different speech guiding the country in a different direction. For this year’s address, Kim Jong Un has used his own style of political rhetoric that no longer seems bound to his predecessors.
Since 2012, the year when Kim Jong Un started ruling North Korea, mentions of Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il have been fixed contents of Kim Jong Un’s speeches.
The former leaders’ names were mentioned only four times throughout the whole address
But since 2015’s address, the mentions of the former leaders have declined in frequency and their names replaced by other terms, such as Suryong or “General.”
The same thing happened in 2016’s address, as both former leaders’ names were not directly mentioned, but were only briefly spoken of as a parts of sentences such as “Kim Il Sung-Kim Jong Il military tactical strategies” or “the Kim Il Sung-Kim Jong Il working class.” The former leaders’ names were mentioned only four times throughout the whole address.
This change shows that Kim Jong Un’s base of legitimacy is still laying in his “Paekdu bloodline,” coming from his predecessors, but he will no longer depend only on his predecessors, and start to stand as the one and only perfect figure, the Suryong of North Korea.
LESS ‘MILITARY-FIRST’
The North Korean leadership’s effort to break free from the “military-first policy” had already begun at the end of Kim Jong Il’s era. But the real effort to break free took place under Kim Jong Un’s rule.
The word Songun, or “military-first” policy, was only mentioned twice in this year’s address. We can say that this is Kim Jong Un’s intent, to decrease the excessive political influence of high-ranking officers of the North’s Korean People’s Army. In some ways, the word Songun should no longer be read as the supreme status of military officials in North Korean society, but just the political word that unites today’s North Korean society.
ECONOMIC CONFIDENCE
Economic coverage in this year’s address was generally similar to that of last year.
One thing that stands out is that Kim Jong Un urged the people to produce “more high-quality products that are competitive in the global market.” This quote shows an important difference from 2015’s address, during which Kim Jong Un ordered the country’s factories and companies to be less dependent on importing goods, but to fight to localize raw materials, building materials and equipment.
Of course, there is a chance that this might be more typical North Korean rhetoric. But overall, in the 2016 address, Kim Jong Un’s confidence in managing the nation’s independent economic structure could be clearly read. 
FOREIGN, SOUTHERN RELATIONS
Readers must observe closely that Kim Jong Un emphasized “building strength by one’s self” during his address.
One can argue that it was just a general statement that Kim made, but looking back at recent China-North Korea relations, this can be read as an indirect message from Pyongyang to Beijing.
The recent cancellation of the Moranbong Band’s concert, which was to be held in Beijing, shows the present state of relations between the two. Both need each other for the future, but neither will be able to fully trust the other.
Kim’s oration this year also showed revulsion and regret toward the U.S.
Kim Jong Un has blamed U.S as the root of the rising tension in the Korean Peninsula and the East Asian region.
“The U.S has adamantly turned away from our effort to lessen the tension in Korean Peninsula, by changing current ceasefire agreement in to peace treaty, as we have suggested numerous times,” said Kim Jong Un during this year’s address.
The inter-Korean relations of 2016 look bumpy based on Kim’s speech
“The U.S. has been depending on anti-North Korea policy to raise tensions between two, and the U.S.’s followers have been clinging on their efforts to claim the violation of human rights in our country.”
This can be read as the North’s slandering of U.S. policy, but at the same time, it suggests that North Korea’s thirst to establish a direct communication window with the U.S. is very desperate.
While Kim’s address in 2015 included the possibility of summit talks between two countries, this year Kim only mentioned the need for South Korea to change its attitude toward North Korea and how the chances of a conversation can alter according to South’s intent to change.
This message cannot be read as anything close to North Korea’s intent to actively continue talks with the South. The inter-Korean relations of 2016 look bumpy based on Kim’s speech.
WHAT CHOICE TO MAKE?
The three main directions of North Korean policies could be hinted at in this year’s address. First, in domestic policy, Kim Jong Un will try to get away from the halo effect of his predecessors and build up his own “Kim Jong Un-style of governing” to make his policies appeal to North Koreans.
To call for a massive shift between generations of North Koreans, Kim Jong Un seems likely to get aggressive in his “love for the people policy” targeting the youth.
In inter-Korean policy, Kim Jong Un would leave the window of communication opened, but will most likely not show any sign of yielding in negotiations, and such actions are expected to induce anxiousness in South Korean policymakers.
Translated by JH Ahn from Cha’s blog and Facebook account.
Featured image: KCNA

Wednesday, 30 December 2015

important: Kim Yang Gon/ Gone.

Inter-Korean pointman Kim Yang Gon dies in car accident: KCNA
Inter-Korean pointman Kim Yang Gon dies in car accident: KCNA
KCNA report that Kim died on December 29
December 29th, 2015
Kim Yang Gon, director of North Korea’s United Front Department, has died in a road accident, North Korean state media outlet the Korea Central News Agency (KCNA) reported on Wednesday morning.
“Kim Yang Gon passed away on Juche 103 (2015) December 29 due to a road accident, ” an English translation of the KCNA material quoted by South Korean press said.
A separate news piece from KCNA said Kim would be given a state funeral, which will be held on December 31 at 8 AM.
Kim was director of the United Front Department (UFD) since 2007, the department of the ruling Workers’ Party of Korea which is responsible for inter-Korean affairs, roughly the North’s counterpart to Seoul’s Ministry of Unification.
As director of the UFD, Kim served as Pyongyang’s point-man on relations with the South, most notably participating in marathon talks at Panmunjom last August with South Korean counterparts following the landmine crisis.
Notably, Kim’s death follows persistent rumors about the purge or reeducation of Choe Ryong Hae, WPK Secretary for the Workers’ Organization and chairman of the State Physical Culture and Sports Guidance Commission.
Choe, who negotiated closely with Kim at August’s marathon inter-Korean talks, himself last appeared in state media on October 22 and was unseen for the entire month of November, including his conspicuous absence at Ri Ul Sol’s funeral.
“The big question of course now is who will assume Kim’s role as point-man on the South,” said John Grisafi, NK News Director of Intelligence, about Kim’s death. “His successor could just as easily come from another part of the Party or government, someone else with experience dealing with the South,” Grisafi continued.
Michael Madden, a long-time watcher of the DPRK leadership, told NK News that Kim’s replacement would not likely be announced until May, when a rare party congress event is due to take place.
“I am concerned that during the interregnum that the North’s policy toward ROK may be subsumed by the more hawkish elements within the DPRK’s intelligence community,” warned Madden.
“(The late) Kim was not exactly a moderate, but he was a pragmatist and he was very much able to balance divergent interests in the North’s national security community.
“He was also a skilled bureaucratic manager who managed to retain civilian control over the North’s policymaking toward the South back in 2009 when KJI restructured the intelligence and foreign policy communities,” he continued, adding “the South has lost a reliable interlocutor and contact in Pyongyang.”
Kim was born April 24, 1942, and was 73 years old.  His last appearance in state media was December 1.
Additional reporting: John Grisafi

Movie review: Love is the Perfect Crime 2013. MA. France. World Movies. "A French Uni professor has a reputation for having affairs with his female students". This brief introduction does no justice to the extensive psychological and psycho-drama expanses of this serious story. Beautifully filmed in snow country, perhaps the Alps, and dealing with issues of PTSD, childhood abuse, sociopathy and distinctive dissociative processes. Great characterisations by the actors and tight direction. Certainly not a fun movie, but a worthwhile one in any study of the human condition.


Movie Reviews: 1: Jupiter Ascending and 2: Hara Kiri: Death of a Samurai 1: Jupiter Ascending: I tried, but I just couldn't watch it for more than 5 minutes. A 15 year old New Idea magazine was far more enthralling and relevant. 2: Hara Kiri: Death of a Samurai: World Movies. A destitute samurai asks to commit hara-kiri at the estate of Feudal Lord Kageyu.(MA). This very visually beautiful and somewhat brutal film is set in the warlord times of Japan, in the 1600s after the Shogun system had been decimated and then rebuilt with a vengeance. The subtitled dialogue is very good. The acting is intense and poignant. This is a serious and quite superb movie that analyses the Samurai Code, Shintoism and the struggle for compassion in a harsh and yet honoured & meaningful social caste system. Brutality is there, for sure; as is the enhanced style-ism that defines Shogun culture in that epoch. Riveting performances from the actors and excellent direction and cinematography. Tragic/Beautiful. It reminded me in some ways of Yasunari Kawabata's book Beauty & Sadness and serves well in making understandable some of the more difficult aspects of militarism, art and culture in that remarkably human, though not humane, epoch. It could be called 'a search for compassion in a hard time in the world'/ in this way it has many universal qualities. Characters are very brilliantly developed and on show. A masterpiece of modern Japanese insight-cinema from 2011.


Monday, 28 December 2015

Reading Yukio Mishima's views are how I worked out, after 25 years in palliative care nursing, how suicide is basically okay to me. It is about the way it is done. You don't need a terminal illness to kill yourself welll...you can just perceive that the world is a place you no longer belong to. You don't need any illness to do that. That will just happen for some people who experience life enough. I would suggest that anyone wishing to commit suicide first read all of Mishima's works. There are so many, and every one of them is excellent. He absolutely knew what he was doing. He showed the noble way that maintains meaning. The idea that the action that causes your death should be only brought about by yourself, and in a very private way, and a very painful way, without causing any harm to anyone else, especially the physical finders and collectors of your remains,still holds great meaning to me. 1: Suicide, real good suicide, is not about hurting or shocking anyone, or blaming anyone. 2: It is an intensely private decision. 3: The death itself must be more painful than the life you have lived, and it must be done by yourself to yourself. 4: The important thing is that you must arrange all the circumstances for it in a way that does no harm to others. This is your life, and this is your death, and this is your choice. Don't make a mess. Don't make a visual memory for those behind you. In this way suicide actually does mean something very positive...that we control the world and choose to leave under our own excellent power to do so. This is one of the reasons I have lost interest in the Euthanasia debate. If you want to kill yourself, then do it. Don't expect society to help you. Society isn't really set up for that. It's far too challenging. You have the means...any $2 blade...any time...don't make an issue of it for others. Do what you need to do for your own end. There's nothing wrong with that...but just don't leave a mess, and suffer more in dying than you did in living...this shows you are committed to leaving us. Anyone on earth will respect you for doing that. there comes a time.


Towards a New Year

A New Year about to Dawn.
I guess it should take most of a life time to define one's own philosophy from the various learnings and listenings and experiences of the time.
Some of this is based upon influences of society, and also some is based upon personal, individual perspectives, plus some radical, lurking variables.
It is hard to imagine a world, a society, a community, a family, in which most people arrive at similar conclusions or in most ways think the same way. I guess if we all did this, then we would appear simply as cogs in a machine.
I guess this is what disturbs me about the world, the society, the community and the family as it appears.
The purposes of life in these still early years of the 21st Century seem twofold: to consume the world completely, and then, through mortgage, to be consumed by the world completely, whilst caring less and less about the well being of others having a harder time.
I looked at my 'ten policies' for Australia should I wish to go into politics and I thought...yes, well, I deeply believe in these items and in this agenda. Then I thought...but does anyone else see things my way?
No. Does this mean that my notions are wrong or even right? No.
Then what is the value of these ideas nutted out over a long time?
Interesting point.
This reminds me of a particular difficult time, about ten years in my life, when I was prevented, by someone's great and resolute anger at me, from seeing my daughter. I was told that 1/3 of people are like this in the world...they will punish you for not meeting their expectations no matter what the laws or common senses say. Still, as a man, I did pretty well with that kind of oppression and made sure that my daughter knew who I was...more for her benefit than mine.
I was advised by a very wise person to, during the years of being separated from my daughter, to write to her each day and to each day send off these letters, gifts, notes, postcards to her.
At first hearing of this advice I said 'but she will never see these letters, notes, gifts or postcards from me. She will never know anything of this'.
My adviser said 'Of course, she won't know any of this...but you will know all of this.'
This was a good adviser.It is rare to find any in this world; a world so content with the consumer notion of 'closure' rather than with the human notion of life-long individual commitment to another person.
In this way care and human commitment prevails, unbought, unsold.
As for the impact on my daughter, she knows who I am. I always thought that it was good for a girl to know how her father is; and that she lives in a world that is not so harsh or narrow in terms of her development. As far as I know, she is a happy person.
As for the impact on me, as a father, and as a being, I know I did most things I possibly could do to enable her good development in this world.
For some reason this continues to make me feel quite young in my ageing...and quite young in thinking that the world is a pretty good place as long as you come to it with enough commitment to not know your limitations.
My philosophy is that we attain certain qualities of meaning through effort towards a good goal for the world, our society, our community, our family, and ourselves.
The place for bitterness regarding the life experience is thereby limited and subservient to real human progress, good thinking, and young meaning, in all its forms.
I did not gain strength or meaning from my life due to spiritual or religions dimensions at all, but rather through good advice, persistence, failure, abiding, and human reason and I believe these are the most important things...these are the notions that abide. The rest of the notions have already disappeared even before you get to them...and the rest thus conforms to the notions of existentialism postulated 500 years ago by Michel de Montaigne, the father of existentialism, and the inventor of the essay as a form of human communication.
This is my essay, my life is my brief essay.
Me: "Teacher. Have I learnt enough?"
Teacher: "Student, Have you learnt enough?"
Me: 'Mostly, but my notions are quite absurd to others.'
Teacher: 'Absurdity is the norm for human beings. At least you have been bothered by life enough to think about it.Please, continue.'