Thursday, 24 March 2011
Tripoli
I knew a very old man who was an Australian soldier in World War One, the War to End All Wars, The Great War for Civilisation. His ship arrived in Tripoli, in Libya, and he said all he could smell was gasoline, there was just so much gasoline everywhere...then he and his comrades went fighting all through the Middle East and then they liberated a grateful Palestine.
Wednesday, 23 March 2011
Tenzin Gyatso and the way of meaninglessness
Noting that one of the three current Dalai Lamas, Tenzin Gyatso, has said he'll step down from being the political leader of the Tibetan National Government in Exile after a lifetime of saying that he's not a political leader and that the Tibetan National Government in Exile doesn't want to be the Tibetan National Government Not in Exile. Mendacious Mindfulness of Meaninglessness 101.
Politics Behind Attacks on Libya/ China Daily
US, British and French forces began their military strikes against Libya on Saturday in an operation the United States has codenamed Operation Odyssey Dawn.
The military action followed a West-engineered United Nations Security Council resolution on the establishment of a "no-fly" zone in Libya and started with an hours-long bombardment of the North African country.
Western countries have long harbored the intention of dethroning Libya's Muammar Gadhafi regime. The recent military strife in the country between government troops and rebels offered an immediate and a rare excuse for Western military intervention.
In the wake of political, economic and social crises in neighboring Egypt, Tunisia and other Middle East countries, Libya was soon hit by a similar social unrest, with opposition forces calling for Gadhafi to relinquish his decades-long hold on power. But the crisis in Libya was partly a result of political incitement from Western countries, which seem to have seen a glimmer of hope that Gadhafi might be driven from power by unrest such as that in Egypt.
The Gadhafi regime, however, chose to take a tough stance and mobilize the military. In the face of the more powerful government troops, Libya's opposition forces were soon on the brink of collapse, a result beyond the expectations of the US-led Western nations. Against this backdrop, the Western countries plotted a "no-fly" zone resolution within the UN Security Council and then launched military assaults in the name of guaranteeing the implementation of the UN mandate.
But no matter what the well-decorated excuses, the latest military action in Libya is part of Western political and strategic intentions.
The US and other Western countries have long regarded the Libyan ruler as a thorn in their flesh that, they believe, should be uprooted. However, any means adopted by the West over the past years failed to produce a power change in the oil-rich African country. Under these circumstances, the ongoing Middle East unrest was seen as a rare opportunity for the West to oust Gadhafi and realize a power change in Libya.
Some politicians in the West are also using the military action in Libya as a means to extricate themselves from their current political predicaments.
In the US, the ongoing social crises as well as public demonstrations in Wisconsin and other states have plunged many state organs into functional paralysis. The government has also suffered a setback on the issue of the federal budget because of opposition from Congress. As a result, US President Barack Obama's approval rating has declined to a record low since he took office. His declining popularity, if not curbed, will pose a severe challenge to Obama's bid for re-election. In this context, a limited military action in Libya is possibly seen as an effective way to help Obama to break away from the current unfavorable political situation.
France, the spearhead of the latest Western action in Libya, is also suffering from widespread social problems. With strikes spreading, President Nicolas Sarkozy still trailed his political rival Marine Le Pen, the leader of the far-right National Front in a latest opinion poll, despite several cabinet reshuffles. His party hopes that France's military action in Libya will help boost Sarkozy's popularity ahead of next year's elections.
Given their unparalleled military pre-eminence, the military action by the multinational coalition in Libya is capable of producing a power change in the North African nation. But in view of Gadhafi's clout within Libya and his announced determination to unite all the people in the fight against Western aggression, the coalition forces will in all likelihood refrain from launching a large-scale and highly intensive ground offensive.
In the face of the much more powerful Western military forces, the possibility cannot be ruled out that Gadhafi will adopt a flexible stance by choosing to hold talks with the opposition parties and asking for mediation from other major powers and even from the UN.
The author is deputy secretary-general of the China Council for National Security Policy Studies.
(China Daily 03/22/2011 page8
The military action followed a West-engineered United Nations Security Council resolution on the establishment of a "no-fly" zone in Libya and started with an hours-long bombardment of the North African country.
Western countries have long harbored the intention of dethroning Libya's Muammar Gadhafi regime. The recent military strife in the country between government troops and rebels offered an immediate and a rare excuse for Western military intervention.
In the wake of political, economic and social crises in neighboring Egypt, Tunisia and other Middle East countries, Libya was soon hit by a similar social unrest, with opposition forces calling for Gadhafi to relinquish his decades-long hold on power. But the crisis in Libya was partly a result of political incitement from Western countries, which seem to have seen a glimmer of hope that Gadhafi might be driven from power by unrest such as that in Egypt.
The Gadhafi regime, however, chose to take a tough stance and mobilize the military. In the face of the more powerful government troops, Libya's opposition forces were soon on the brink of collapse, a result beyond the expectations of the US-led Western nations. Against this backdrop, the Western countries plotted a "no-fly" zone resolution within the UN Security Council and then launched military assaults in the name of guaranteeing the implementation of the UN mandate.
But no matter what the well-decorated excuses, the latest military action in Libya is part of Western political and strategic intentions.
The US and other Western countries have long regarded the Libyan ruler as a thorn in their flesh that, they believe, should be uprooted. However, any means adopted by the West over the past years failed to produce a power change in the oil-rich African country. Under these circumstances, the ongoing Middle East unrest was seen as a rare opportunity for the West to oust Gadhafi and realize a power change in Libya.
Some politicians in the West are also using the military action in Libya as a means to extricate themselves from their current political predicaments.
In the US, the ongoing social crises as well as public demonstrations in Wisconsin and other states have plunged many state organs into functional paralysis. The government has also suffered a setback on the issue of the federal budget because of opposition from Congress. As a result, US President Barack Obama's approval rating has declined to a record low since he took office. His declining popularity, if not curbed, will pose a severe challenge to Obama's bid for re-election. In this context, a limited military action in Libya is possibly seen as an effective way to help Obama to break away from the current unfavorable political situation.
France, the spearhead of the latest Western action in Libya, is also suffering from widespread social problems. With strikes spreading, President Nicolas Sarkozy still trailed his political rival Marine Le Pen, the leader of the far-right National Front in a latest opinion poll, despite several cabinet reshuffles. His party hopes that France's military action in Libya will help boost Sarkozy's popularity ahead of next year's elections.
Given their unparalleled military pre-eminence, the military action by the multinational coalition in Libya is capable of producing a power change in the North African nation. But in view of Gadhafi's clout within Libya and his announced determination to unite all the people in the fight against Western aggression, the coalition forces will in all likelihood refrain from launching a large-scale and highly intensive ground offensive.
In the face of the much more powerful Western military forces, the possibility cannot be ruled out that Gadhafi will adopt a flexible stance by choosing to hold talks with the opposition parties and asking for mediation from other major powers and even from the UN.
The author is deputy secretary-general of the China Council for National Security Policy Studies.
(China Daily 03/22/2011 page8
Tuesday, 22 March 2011
Indonesian Troubles
oh, on the news...i see the wave of unrest in muslim countries may be coming to indonesia...ooooh. retired army generals are promoting unrest and dissatisfaction with the president. libya, iraq etc is not important to asia...but indonesia is very important to asia.
Sunday, 20 March 2011
Oil is thicker than blood
The War on Libya so begins on the 8th anniversary of the war on Iraq, to the day, with 110 Cruise missiles landing in the cities of Libya; and on the night of the big Perigee moon. This is War and war is Hell. Why wait til we're dead...why not create Hell on earth now, and call it Justice? Peace is so much harder. Oil floats on top of blood, and covers every truth and every decent thing.
Saturday, 19 March 2011
Book-Tom Carter-China Portrait of a People
Friday, 18 March 2011
The Benefit of Non-Interference
It was Michel de Montaigne in 1580 who said something along the lines of 'I cannot control the world and events so therefore I control myself' and so I think i'll do that rather than ranting about the West's perpetual invasions that always end up causing greater harm than they could possibly prevent. With Libya, I simply believe that it is up to Libyans to work out their problems. It's an imperfect calculation but far less imperfect than a horrific invasion and the inevitable destruction of a society (see Iraq and Afghanistan). Libyans have to work out their issues and external force doesn't really work. Foreign armies don't 'do peace'.The same goes for Korea...the North and the South must work out their disunity for themselves. It's no good to have such massive interference from 'great defenders' because after 50 years its worse than it was when it was divided by the 'great defenders' of each. Koreans north and south are blood brothers and Im sure there will be some blood spilled in accepting each other and working things out, but its no one elses business.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)